<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Anarchism on blog.nath.page</title>
    <link>https://blog.nath.page/tags/anarchism/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Anarchism on blog.nath.page</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.nath.page/tags/anarchism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Is Hayek Socialist? A Note on The Road to Serfdom</title>
      <link>https://blog.nath.page/posts/rtsnote/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.nath.page/posts/rtsnote/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=&#34;Hayek&#34; loading=&#34;lazy&#34; src=&#34;https://blog.nath.page/images/hayek.webp&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6GTrNuCkP4&#34;&gt;Saifedean Ammous&amp;rsquo; podcast with Thomas Massey&lt;/a&gt;, Hayek is accused of being a little too socialist and his book &lt;em&gt;The Road to Serfdom&lt;/em&gt; overrated. He is praised, however, for being diplomatic enough with the mainstream to remain relevant until winning the Swedish Central Bank Prize (the so-called Nobel Prize), and then speaking the anarchist language.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Road to Serfdom&lt;/em&gt; is the only book by Friedrich Hayek that I have read, and based on just that, I have to disagree with the socialist-lite characterization. The ideas he promotes are libertarian. He does not go up against the Keynesians, but then, the book was meant to target socialists, which it did.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gresham&#39;s Law and Price Ceilings</title>
      <link>https://blog.nath.page/posts/greshamslaw2/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.nath.page/posts/greshamslaw2/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Note that the law applies not just to a particular type of coins, but to the exchange rates between different money commodities as well. Suppose in a bimetallic standard, &lt;code&gt;metal A&lt;/code&gt; is pegged to &lt;code&gt;metal B&lt;/code&gt; at a ratio of 1:10, but the market value of a unit of &lt;code&gt;metal A&lt;/code&gt; is 12x that of &lt;code&gt;metal B&lt;/code&gt;. In this case, we have a price ceiling whereby &lt;code&gt;metal A&lt;/code&gt; is artificially undervalued, and per Gresham&amp;rsquo;s Law, will be driven out of circulation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gresham&#39;s Law Clarified</title>
      <link>https://blog.nath.page/posts/greshamslaw/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.nath.page/posts/greshamslaw/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=&#34;debased_coin&#34; loading=&#34;lazy&#34; src=&#34;https://blog.nath.page/images/debased-coin.webp&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gresham&amp;rsquo;s Law is frequently oversimplified as &lt;strong&gt;&amp;ldquo;bad money drives good money out of circulation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/strong&gt; This phenomenon has been observed in history whenever debasement of coins has occurred. In such cases, people choose to collect coins with the greater precious metal content and spend the debased coins. Over time, the &amp;lsquo;good&amp;rsquo; money, the coins with more precious metal in them, get driven out of circulation by &amp;lsquo;bad&amp;rsquo; money, the debased coins.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
