<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Hayek on blog.nath.page</title>
    <link>https://blog.nath.page/tags/hayek/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hayek on blog.nath.page</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.nath.page/tags/hayek/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Is Hayek Socialist? A Note on The Road to Serfdom</title>
      <link>https://blog.nath.page/posts/rtsnote/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.nath.page/posts/rtsnote/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=&#34;Hayek&#34; loading=&#34;lazy&#34; src=&#34;https://blog.nath.page/images/hayek.webp&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6GTrNuCkP4&#34;&gt;Saifedean Ammous&amp;rsquo; podcast with Thomas Massey&lt;/a&gt;, Hayek is accused of being a little too socialist and his book &lt;em&gt;The Road to Serfdom&lt;/em&gt; overrated. He is praised, however, for being diplomatic enough with the mainstream to remain relevant until winning the Swedish Central Bank Prize (the so-called Nobel Prize), and then speaking the anarchist language.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Road to Serfdom&lt;/em&gt; is the only book by Friedrich Hayek that I have read, and based on just that, I have to disagree with the socialist-lite characterization. The ideas he promotes are libertarian. He does not go up against the Keynesians, but then, the book was meant to target socialists, which it did.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why the Worst Get on Top</title>
      <link>https://blog.nath.page/posts/hayekworst/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.nath.page/posts/hayekworst/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I recently revisited the chapter titled &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href=&#34;https://fee.org/resources/the-road-to-serfdom-chapter-10-why-the-worst-get-on-top/&#34;&gt;Why the Worst Get on Top&lt;/a&gt;&amp;rdquo; from FA Hayek&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;The Road to Serfdom&lt;/em&gt;. The essay discusses the sociopolitical dynamics within a totalitarian system that inevitably encourage and enable bad actors to gain power while sidelining decent people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The worst features of totalitarian governments are not accidental or avoidable; they are features totalitarianism produces given enough time to operate. Just as a socialist planner must choose between either assuming dictatorial powers or abandoning his plans, a totalitarian dictator must renounce morality or fail. Socialism produces a totalitarian society, which places at its helm a dictator not bound by common morals, and from this system we get social and economic repression, destruction of life and property, elimination of political alternatives, conscription, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
