Inflation

In my previous discussion about the effects of inflation, I missed an important point. This might be the most pernicious of its cultural effects: inflation discourages productivity and encourages speculation. The distortions generated by inflation are not immediately apparent. While an inflationary episode is underway, labor is tricked into accepting the same nominal wage (that is, accepting a lower real wage), since price levels have not risen yet. Soon, prices rise and the decline in purchasing power becomes apparent. Long after the prices have risen are the labor able to negotiate a (nominal) wage increase. This increase is also likely to be lower than the rate of inflation, thus the real wage continues to be lower than what it was prior to the inflationary episode. A decline in real wages discourages productivity. ...

Statement The level of prices depend on the quantity of money. Early discussions on this matter can be found in the essays of John Locke, David Hume and Irving Fisher (see Reference). Discussion Provided that the item used as money can be divided and combined as necessary, any amount of money is sufficient for running an economy. Ideas about bringing lasting changes to an economy by expanding the money supply are invalid. Should the money supply increase, all else equal, the prices of goods and services would increase proportionately. Thus, the outcome would ultimately be neutral. ...

Free market interactions led to the emergence of gold as money. Gold was divisible, durable, recognizable, and most importantly, difficult to inflate. Thus, it maintained its purchasing power better than other commodities that were easier to produce. However, gold suffered from certain drawbacks. While it was divisible, dividing it physically was practical only to a certain point. Also, carrying it in large quantities was costly and cumbersome. Furthermore, verifying the authenticity of gold coins and bars was time-consuming. ...

In earlier posts, I have regarded inflation as counterfeiting conducted by the government. This is not hyperbole. It is merely calling an activity its proper name. The Illegal Case To understand this label, let us go over what happens when an ordinary criminal counterfeits money. Suppose these fake tokens are virtually indistinguishable from already circulating monetary units. The criminal and his associates are able to go to the market and buy goods and services at prevailing rates. These people benefit the most: they did not even have to part with anything of value to obtain these tokens. ...

Inflation (that is, the counterfeiting of money by the government) has several destructive effects on the economy. It transfers wealth from late recipients of newly issued monetary units to those who receive them relatively earlier. It hurts the ability of economic actors to perform economic calculation. It degrades the quality of goods and services produced in the economy. Furthermore, it causes boom and bust cycles in the economy. Wealth Redistribution The overall effect of the introduction of new monetary tokens is a general increase in price levels. But this effect is neither smooth nor instantaneous. Not everyone acquires an equal amount of these tokens, or at the same time. Also, not all prices rise proportionately, or at the same time. ...

Private individuals and businesses must either sell something of value to acquire money or expend time and resources to mine it directly (think of gold mining in the case of a gold standard). Governments, in contrast, do not obtain payment for goods or services they produce; they generate revenues through the seizure of assets. In the past, they might have sent their agents to seize grains, cattle, coins, etc. from people. But in a monetary economy, they simply seize monetary assets, which is a lot easier to do. ...

Any amount of money in an economy is ‘abundant’ provided it can be divided and combined according to the needs of the economic actors. That’s not the kind of abundance I’m referring to in the title. I’m instead referring to monetary inflation. More than the absolute stock of money, what’s relevant is the rate at which it is increasing. The Medium of Exchange Problem As discussed in Price and Money, a price is simply the exchange rate between two goods/services. Money is a good that acts as a medium of exchange, negating the need for double coincidence of wants. Due to the prevalence of money, Adam can sell his service to ‘buy’ money, and then ‘sell’ the money to buy goods he wants. This renders unnecessary for the sellers of those goods to desire Adam’s service before Adam may have his wants met. ...

Central bankers and economic textbooks will have you believe that economic inflation is “an increase in the general price levels.” Due to inflation, your money is worth less than before—its purchasing power lower than it used to be. Capitalism, fall in supply, rise in demand, etc. are blamed. Everything but the main culprit is discussed. This is an instance of exclusionary detailing. Learn to see through the smoke and mirrors. ...

Gresham’s Law is frequently oversimplified as “bad money drives good money out of circulation.” This phenomenon has been observed in history whenever debasement of coins has occurred. In such cases, people choose to collect coins with the greater precious metal content and spend the debased coins. Over time, the ‘good’ money, the coins with more precious metal in them, get driven out of circulation by ‘bad’ money, the debased coins. ...